The more you know: Moustache vs. Mustache #movember

I was terribly confused a few days ago. I was fairly confident I was spelling Moustache correctly. 

Screen_shot_2011-11-20_at_5

I fancy myself as quite the orthographer. So I decided to let Google trends answer this question:

Screen_shot_2011-11-20_at_5

Aha! I was right. Moustache wins!  But wait a minute... what if I just looked in the United States:

Screen_shot_2011-11-20_at_5

So now you know, Mustache is the common US spelling. Consider this valuable info my penance for dropping out of Movember early. I've also saved you a trip to Wikipedia.

Screen_shot_2011-11-20_at_5
An excercise to the reader: would Jimmy Wales see a higher conversion rate if his "personal appeal" photo was updated daily to demonstrate that he were growing a moustache for Movember?

I'm better than that. (remembering Steve Jobs)

My Ph.D. advisor was definitely a "Mac guy." Although we had PCs at our desks, he put an iMac G5 in the lab common space (c.a. 2005). I never thought much about it until the one day I had to use it for the scanner. 

Over the next few days, I found myself using the iMac more and more, and not just for the scanning. I was mesmorized by the display, speed, and noticeable lack of crashes. Within a couple of weeks, probably to the annoyance of my colleagues, I had effectively moved my workspace to the lab common space. Without warning, I had become a "Mac guy."

At the risk of sounding trite, I will say that this was a turning point in my life.

One of my first reactions was anger: why had I wasted so much time with inferior technology? Why had I put up with hours upon hours of configuring, troubleshooting, and maintaining my PC? Why did I spend 12 hours per day staring at a blurry screen? Why had I allowed the PC industry to sell me lemons again and again?

I had this realization: "I'm better than that."

If I look back and "connect the dots," I see that this was the precise moment when I knew I wanted to work on consumer technology. Thank you Steve for helping me realize that products should empower and delight, never frustrate. Thank you for teaching us that we should always pour our heart and soul into our work. In his immortal words, "Don't settle."

Software Pricing: did Rosetta Stone miss a big opportunity?

Media_httpwwwcrunchge_fdsfg

Rosetta Stone just released its new iPad app. I can't think of a better platform for learning a language than the iPad. Even though the app is free in the iTunes store, you must be an existing Rosetta Stone customer to use it. Minimum required investment to use this product: $179 USD. Ouch!

From where I stand, I see this pricing decision as a major missed opportunity for Rosetta Stone. What if they released this app for $39? Expensive enough to seem legit, but cheap enough to capitalize on brand recognition. I would love to spend $39 for several hours of a Japanese refresher. As someone who has never touched a Rosetta Stone product, I would have purchased it instantly at this price point given that a) Rosetta Stone has a reputation for being very effective b) Rosetta Stone has a reputation for being very expensive.

Furthermore, the $39 iPad app could serve as a gateway drug to other regularly priced Rosetta Stone products on other platforms. They could have even offered a $39 credit to iPad customers toward the full platform.

I would love to know how many new users will sign up for the full $179 service as a result of the iPad offering. My intuition says the $39 entry point would have been far more profitable in the long run.